The Cuban Revolutionary War Research Paper Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 1250 words

The Cuban Revolutionary War - Research Paper Example According to Minster, the Cuban revolutionary war was started by the former Sergeant army Fulgencio Batista who took power following a highly contested and disputed presidential election. History has it that Batista became president of Cuba from 1940 to 1944 and again attempted to resume power in the 1952 presidential election. Upon realizing that he was likely to lose in the election, retired Sergeant Batista seized power before actual election date. In the reports of Minster, the presidential election of 1952 was projected to favor a new presidential candidate, Fidel Castro. Upon cancellation of election results due to the ensuing political upheaval, Mr. Fidel Castro begun to plan strategies by which he could oust President Batista. In order to fight the ruling government, Mr. Fidel Castro had to organize for weapons to wage attacks specially destined against Moncada Barracks, which was perceived to bear the power of the government military force. In July1953, Castro organized 138 militia men with whom they attacked Moncada Barracks resulting in the capture of the rebel militia men and death of nineteen federal soldiers (Minster). The war also led to the arrest of Fidel Castro and Raul Castro alongside some of the rebel soldiers. Other soldiers died of gun shots of the fierce federal armies. Fidel Castro and Raul Castro together with the rebels faced to public trial for their involvement in the botched coup. Hutsell, Sanders and Kuntz report that being a professional lawyer; Fidel Castro defended himself by claiming that he waged a just war against the perceived dictatorial regime under the leadership of Batista. Despite the justification of Castro’s defense speech, he was sentenced to fifteen year imprisonment. Minster reports that in May 1955, Batista’s government faced numerous accusations from the international spectrum accusing him of tyrannical leadership. In the effect, the government released all the prisoners including the rebels who took part in the attacks on Moncada Barracks. Hutsell, Kuntz and Sanders further confirm that upon release, Fidel Castro and Raul Castro flew to Mexico to organize another strategy for more sustained attacks on Batista’s government. In Mexico, Raul and Fidel met the exiled Cubans with whom they joined hands to form the 26th July Movement typically named as a commemoration of the Moncada militia attacks. In the group of the organ ized revolutionary militia in Mexico organized to propagate war against Batista’s government, were the Camilo Cienfuegos and the Argentine doctor by the name Ernesto Che Guevara. In November of 1956, the top leaders comprising of Fidel, Raul, Camilo and Ernesto together with other eighty two men sailed to Cuba in full preparation for the revolutionary war against the government of President Batista (Hutsell, Kuntz and Sanders). Minster illustrates that the arrival of the militia group from Mexico was well discerned by Batista’s administration and had therefore prepared to face them off. However, the ingenuity of Raul and Fidel made them to lead their group to the thick and impenetrable woodland located in the center of Cuba. Minster confirms that the revolutionary group used the opportunity in the forest to regroup and attract other new members. The period spent on the highland forest also assisted towards collection of weapons for waging the guerrilla war against the armies of the ruling government. On 26th July

Principels of Management ; Discssion Board 4 Term Paper

Principels of Management ; Discssion Board 4 - Term Paper Example By bringing operative employees into the decision making process, establishing a planning committee made up of three management members and three operative employees, starting a suggestion system, and installing a performance appraisal is a clear sign that Wallace embraces consultative leadership style. It happens with new management so as to understand some rules and organization culture. Leaders, though authoritative in the way they handle issues, tend to be paternalistic in nature. This is evident in the manner in which Rusty manages operations in the Plastic division. He believes work is work and if an employee does not improve, it is better they quit. In addition, he is firm and does not tolerate any form of nonsense but every employee likes him because he handles everything squarely. Wallace can use transactional leadership with Rusty because it will help help define systems and establish chain of command and make sure subordinates remain answerable to the management of be punished. Alternatively, Wallace can use participative leadership style in that he allows Rusty to make proposals about some decisions and decides whether they are good or not. Just as Rusty wants it done, being highly participative means that decision making is delegated to him as Wallace watches and advices where necessary. I agree with Rusty’s sentiments. People already like him and his style of leadership. In such a large organization, there is need for authoritative governance to ensure efficiency in production and system control. Having employees as participants in the decision-making process does not improve production quality if the leader is not strong enough to watch over activities and ensure every procedure is followed to the latter. What if employees decide to influence and demand for implementation of awkward policies that can lead to the downfall of the organization? What if employees do not have any competency skills in decision making? Producing items according to